ENVIRONMENTAL AND COST-EFFECTIVENESS COMPARISON OF DUAL FUEL PROPULSION OPTIONS FOR EMISSIONS REDUCTION ONBOARD LNG CARRIERS

The selection of the suitable propulsion system for LNG carrier highly affects the ship capital and life cycle costs. The current paper compares between the available propulsion systems for LNG carriers from environmental and economic points of view operated with heavy fuel oil (HFO) and marine gas oil (MGO). In addition, the cost-effectiveness for emission reduction due to using dual fuel propulsion options using natural gas fuel (NG) is calculated. As a case study, large conventional LNG carrier class has been investigated. The results show that steam turbine (ST), Ultra-ST, dual fuel diesel engine (DFDE), and combined gas and steam (COGAS) propulsion options can comply with NOx and SOx emissions regulations set by IMO using dual fuel mode with NG percentages of 87.5%, 82%, 98.5% and 94%, respectively. DFDE operated with pilot HFO and NG is the most economic propulsion option. It reduces the dual fuel costs by 1.37 MUS$/trip compared with HFO cost. The annual cost-effectiveness for the most economic and emission compliance propulsion option is 6.07$/kg, 6.39 $/kg, and 0.55$/kg for reducing NOx, SOx, and CO2 emissions, respectively

Evidence for penguin-diagram decays: First observation of B→K*(892)γ

complete author list: Ammar R.; Ball S.; Baringer P.; Coppage D.; Copty N.; Davis R.; Hancock N.; Kelly M.; Kwak N.; Lam H.; Kubota Y.; Lattery M.; Nelson J.; Patton S.; Perticone D.; Poling R.; Savinov V.; Schrenk S.; Wang R.; Alam M.; Kim I.; Nemati B.; O'Neill J.; Severini H.; Sun C.; Zoeller M.; Crawford G.; Daubenmeir M.; Fulton R.; Fujino D.; Gan K.; Honscheid K.; Kagan H.; Kass R.; Lee J.; Malchow R.; Morrow F.; Skovpen Y.; Sung M.; White C.; Whitmore J.; Wilson P.; Butler F.; Fu X.; Kalbfleisch G.; Lambrecht M.; Ross W.; Skubic P.; Snow J.; Wang P.; Wood M.; Bortoletto D.; Brown D.; Fast J.; McIlwain R.; Miao T.; Miller D.; Modesitt M.; Schaffner S.; Shibata E.; Shipsey I.; Wang P.; Battle M.; Ernst J.; Kroha H.; Roberts S.; Sparks K.; Thorndike E.; Wang C.; Dominick J.; Sanghera S.; Skwarnicki T.; Stroynowski R.; Artuso M.; He D.; Goldberg M.; Horwitz N.; Kennett R.; Moneti G.; Muheim F.; Mukhin Y.; Playfer S.; Rozen Y.; Stone S.; Thulasidas M.; Vasseur G.; Zhu G.; Bartelt J.; Csorna S.; Egyed Z.; Jain V.; Sheldon P.; Akerib D.; Barish B.; Chadha M.; Chan S.; Cowen D.; Eigen G.; Miller J.; O'Grady C.; Urheim J.; Weinstein A.; Acosta D.; Athanas M.; Masek G.; Ong B.; Paar H.; Sivertz M.; Bean A.; Gronberg J.; Kutschke R.; Menary S.; Morrison R.; Nakanishi S.; Nelson H.; Nelson T.; Richman J.; Ryd A.; Tajima H.; Schmidt D.; Sperka D.; Witherell M.; Procario M.; Yang S.; Balest R.; Cho K.; Daoudi M.; Ford W.; Johnson D.; Lingel K.; Lohner M.; Rankin P.; Smith J.; Alexander J.; Bebek C.; Berkelman K.; Besson D.; Browder T.; Cassel D.; Cho H.; Coffman D.; Drell P.; Ehrlich R.; Garcia-Sciveres M.; Geiser B.; Gittelman B.; Gray S.; Hartill D.; Heltsley B.; Jones C.; Jones S.; Kandaswamy J.; Katayama N.; Kim P.; Kreinick D.; Ludwig G.; Masui J.; Mevissen J.; Mistry N.; Ng C.; Nordberg E.; Ogg M.; Patterson J.; Peterson D.; Riley D.; Salman S.; Sapper M.; Worden H.; Würthwein F.; Avery P.; Freyberger A.; Rodriguez J.; Stephens R.; Yelton J.; Cinabro D.; Henderson S.; Kinoshita K.; Liu T.; Saulnier M.; Shen F.; Wilson R.; Yamamoto H.; Selen M.; Sadoff A.; Ammar R.; Yamamoto H.; Wilson R.; Sadoff A.; Selen M.; Liu T.; Kinoshita K.; Shen F.; Saulnier M.; Yelton J.; Stephens R.; Henderson S.; Cinabro D.; Rodriguez J.; Ammar R.</p

On Multilingual Training of Neural Dependency Parsers

We show that a recently proposed neural dependency parser can be improved by joint training on multiple languages from the same family. The parser is implemented as a deep neural network whose only input is orthographic representations of words. In order to successfully parse, the network has to discover how linguistically relevant concepts can be inferred from word spellings. We analyze the representations of characters and words that are learned by the network to establish which properties of languages were accounted for. In particular we show that the parser has approximately learned to associate Latin characters with their Cyrillic counterparts and that it can group Polish and Russian words that have a similar grammatical function. Finally, we evaluate the parser on selected languages from the Universal Dependencies dataset and show that it is competitive with other recently proposed state-of-the art methods, while having a simple structure.Comment: preprint accepted into the TSD201

Non-Leptonic B Decays into K-Resonances

We estimate the non-leptonic B decays $B \rightarrow (\psi ,\psi^\prime , \chi_{1c})+K^i$, where $K^i$ are various K-meson resonances. We use the model of Isgur, Wise, Scora and Grinstein in the context of heavy quark effective theory, to calculate the hadronic matrix elements. Our estimates show that a substantial fraction of $B \rightarrow X_s \psi$ results in higher resonances of K-meson and besides $B \rightarrow K(K^*) \psi$, a considerable fraction of $B \rightarrow X_s (c\bar c)$ goes to $B \rightarrow (K,K^*)+( \psi^{\prime},\chi_{1c})$.Comment: 9 pages, late

Analysis of light gage steel shear diaphragms

INTRODUCTION It has long been recognized by structural engineers, that light gage steel cladding floor and roof decking systems have a considerable stiffening and strengthening effect on building frameworks. The beneficial contribution of these diaphragm systems is most pronounced when the structure as a whole is subjected to loads which result in an in-plane shear action of the cladding. This occurs, for example, when the rigidity of a floor or roof diaphragm acting as a membrane is utilized to transmit lateral forces to stiff end walls. Another example of diaphragm action is found in pitched roof portal sheds under vertical and lateral loads. In such cases the membrane strength and rigidity of the cladding can be used to restrict the tendency of intermediate frames to sway, by transfering the load to end walls and resulting in substantial economy in the design of the frames. Specific utilization of the in-plane shear strength and stiffness of panelling was suggested more than 18 years ago, but unless this effect could be calculated in advance no practical use could be made. In order to take this contribution to stiffness and strength into account in engineering design, it was necessary to develop means for predicting the effective shear rigidity and ultimate strength in shear of the steel panel diaphragm. Because of the complexity of such diaphragm systems, up to now, engineers have relied upon tests of full-scale-panel assemblies, in which the performance of specific combinations of panels, marginal framing members and connections have been studied on a strictly ad hoc basis. While much has been learned using this approach, and valuable design information was obtained, no rational theory to describe and predict structural behavior has resulted. On the other hand, testing of large full scale diaphragm installations is expensive and time consuming, and tests results are applicable only to identical assembly using the same panels as tested, with directly equivalent fastening systems. The need for a general method of analysis is clear

Analysis of light gage steel shear diaphragms

INTRODUCTION: It has long been recognized by structural engineers, that light gage steel cladding floor and roof decking systems have a considerable stiffening and strengthening effect on building frameworks. The beneficial contribution of these diaphragm systems is most pronounced when the structure as a whole is subjected to loads which result in an in-plane shear action of the cladding. This occurs, for example, when the rigidity of a floor or roof diaphragm acting as a membrane is utilized to transmit lateral forces to stiff end walls. Another example of diaphragm action is found in pitched roof portal sheds under vertical and lateral loads. In such cases the membrane strength and rigidity of the cladding can be used to restrict the tendency of intermediate frames to sway, by transfering the load to end walls and resulting in substantial economy in the design of the frames. Specific utilization of the in-plane shear strength and stiffness of panelling was suggested more than 18 years ago, but unless this effect could be calculated in advance no practical use could be made. In order to take this contribution to stiffness and strength into account in engineering design, it was necessary to develop means for predicting the effective shear rigidity and ultimate strength in shear of the steel panel diaphragm. Because of the complexity of such diaphragm systems, up to now, engineers have relied upon tests of full-scale-panel assemblies, in which the performance of specific combinations of panels, marginal framing members and connections have been studied on a strictly ad hoc basis. While much has been learned using this approach, and valuable design information was obtained, no rational theory to describe and predict structural behavior has resulted. On the other hand, testing of large full scale diaphragm installations is expensive and time consuming, and tests results are applicable only to identical assembly using the same panels as tested, with directly equivalent fastening systems. The need for a general method of analysis is clear

Analysis of light gage steel shear diaphragms

INTRODUCTION: It has long been recognized by structural engineers, that light gage steel cladding floor and roof decking systems have a considerable stiffening and strengthening effect on building frameworks. The beneficial contribution of these diaphragm systems is most pronounced when the structure as a whole is subjected to loads which result in an in-plane shear action of the cladding. This occurs, for example, when the rigidity of a floor or roof diaphragm acting as a membrane is utilized to transmit lateral forces to stiff end walls. Another example of diaphragm action is found in pitched roof portal sheds under vertical and lateral loads. In such cases the membrane strength and rigidity of the cladding can be used to restrict the tendency of intermediate frames to sway, by transfering the load to end walls and resulting in substantial economy in the design of the frames. Specific utilization of the in-plane shear strength and stiffness of panelling was suggested more than 18 years ago, but unless this effect could be calculated in advance no practical use could be made. In order to take this contribution to stiffness and strength into account in engineering design, it was necessary to develop means for predicting the effective shear rigidity and ultimate strength in shear of the steel panel diaphragm. Because of the complexity of such diaphragm systems, up to now, engineers have relied upon tests of full-scale-panel assemblies, in which the performance of specific combinations of panels, marginal framing members and connections have been studied on a strictly ad hoc basis. While much has been learned using this approach, and valuable design information was obtained, no rational theory to describe and predict structural behavior has resulted. On the other hand, testing of large full scale diaphragm installations is expensive and time consuming, and tests results are applicable only to identical assembly using the same panels as tested, with directly equivalent fastening systems. The need for a general method of analysis is clear